Conflict of Interest: What Counts and What to Do About It

  • 6 min reading time

Most board members have a general sense that conflicts of interest are bad and should be avoided. What fewer people know is exactly what counts as one, what to do when you have one and what happens when someone doesn't handle it correctly.

Here's the clear version.

What a Conflict of Interest Is

A conflict of interest exists when a board member has a personal, financial or professional interest in the outcome of a board decision that could compromise or appear to compromise their ability to act in the best interest of the organization.

The key word is "or appear to." A conflict doesn't have to be actual to be a problem. If a reasonable person looking at the situation from the outside would question whether you could be objective, that's enough to warrant disclosure and likely recusal.

How the Definition Varies by Board Type

This is where it gets important. Conflict of interest is not defined the same way across all board types and the differences matter.

Neighborhood councils are typically public bodies governed by city or municipal frameworks. For these organizations conflicts of interest are primarily financial in nature, tied to public ethics laws that focus on financial gain rather than personal relationships. Check with your specific city or governing body for the exact standard that applies to your council.

HOAs are typically governed by state corporation law and their own CC&Rs. Many states define conflicts more broadly to include both financial interests and personal relationships.

Nonprofits are subject to IRS guidelines and state nonprofit law, which tend to define conflicts broadly. Financial interests, personal relationships and competing organizational loyalties can all qualify. Many nonprofits are required to maintain a formal conflict of interest policy and have board members sign annual disclosure statements.

School boards are governed by state education law, which varies significantly. Financial conflicts are nearly universal but many states extend the definition to personal relationships and competing interests as well.

The bottom line: before you assume you know what counts as a conflict on your board, check your governing documents and applicable state law. The standard that applies to one type of organization may be meaningfully different from another.

Common Types of Conflicts

Financial interest. You stand to gain or lose money based on the outcome of a board decision. A vendor you own, a company you have stock in, a property you hold that would be affected by a policy the board is considering.

Personal relationship. Depending on your board type and governing law, being asked to vote on something that directly involves a family member, a close friend or a romantic partner may constitute a conflict. The relationship creates a loyalty that can compromise your judgment even when you believe it won't.

Competing organizational loyalty. You serve on another board or organization that has a direct stake in what your board is deciding. A vote on a partnership, a contract or a position that affects an organization you're also affiliated with puts you in two seats at once.

Personal benefit. The decision would benefit you directly in a way that isn't shared by the broader community. A rezoning that increases the value of your property. A program that employs someone in your household. A policy that creates an advantage for a business you're involved with.

What Doesn't Count

Not every connection is a conflict. Having an opinion about something isn't a conflict. Knowing someone involved in a matter isn't a conflict. Being passionate about an issue the board is deciding isn't a conflict.

The test is whether your personal interest in the outcome is distinct from your interest as a board member serving the community. If the answer is yes, you likely have a conflict. If you're unsure, disclose it anyway and let the board or your governing documents help you decide.

What to Do When You Have One

Disclose it. As soon as you're aware of a potential conflict, say so. Don't wait until the item comes up on the agenda. Tell the chair in advance. Disclosure protects you, protects the board and protects the integrity of the decision.

Recuse yourself. Step out of the discussion and the vote. We covered how to do this properly in Abstentions and Recusals Explained. The short version: state your recusal for the record before the item is discussed and leave the room until it's resolved.

Don't try to influence the outcome from the sidelines. Recusing yourself means removing yourself from the process entirely. Having a private conversation with a board member before the vote, sending an email with your position or commenting after you've stepped out all undermine the point of recusal.

What Happens When Someone Doesn't Handle It

Decisions made with an undisclosed conflict of interest can be challenged and potentially invalidated. Board members who vote on matters where they have an undisclosed conflict may face personal liability depending on your state law and governing documents. The damage to trust within the board and with the community can outlast any single decision by years.

Most governing documents and many state laws have specific provisions about conflicts of interest. Some require board members to sign annual conflict of interest disclosure statements. Some require the conflict and recusal to be recorded in the minutes. Know what your organization requires before you need it.

When It Gets Complicated

Sometimes the line isn't clean. You have a distant connection to something on the agenda. You're not sure if it rises to the level of a formal conflict. You disclosed a potential conflict last year and wonder if you need to keep doing it.

The safest approach is always to disclose and let the process decide. Bring it to the chair or the full board: "I want to flag a potential conflict and let the board determine whether recusal is appropriate." That transparency protects everyone and demonstrates exactly the kind of governance your community deserves.

For a deeper look at when recusal is required and how to do it properly, Abstentions and Recusals Explained covers the mechanics. And Robert's Rules Without the Headache is useful context for how conflicts interact with voting procedure.

The Toolkit

Some links may be affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. I only share tools that I use or recommend.

The Better Meeting Bundle
Method Over Madness Toolkit

↑ Back to Top

← Back to All Resources


More Resources

Black text 'LP Community Works' on a white background

© 2026 LP Community Works, Powered by Shopify

    Login

    Forgot your password?

    Don't have an account yet?
    Create account